Reference for Bava Metzia 46:11

לעולם דלית בהו סימן נפקא מינה לאהדורי לצורבא מרבנן בטביעות עינא שבעתן העין קים ליה בגוייהו ומהדרינן ליה כי לא שבעתן העין לא קים ליה בגוייהו ולא מהדרינן ליה דאמר רב יהודה אמר שמואל בהני תלת מילי עבידי רבנן דמשנו במלייהו במסכת ובפוריא

was deemed to have been abandoned by the owners, as it was seen that weeds had grown upon it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which showed that the pitch had been there for a long time and had been given up by the owner. ');">²⁸</span> R. SIMEON B. ELEAZAR SAYS, etc. What is meant by 'anfuria'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [H] merchandise. [It is connected in dictionaries with the [G]] ');">²⁹</span> Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel: New vessels which one's eye has not yet sufficiently noted.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As they have not been sufficiently long in use, and they cannot be properly recognised when seen again. ');">³⁰</span> — In what circumstances? If there is on them an identification mark — what does it matter if the eye has not yet sufficiently noted them? If there is no identification mark on them-what does it matter if the eye has sufficiently noted them?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If there is nothing particular about them to distinguish them from other vessels the fact that they have been long in use, and that their shape etc. has been fully noted, should make no difference. ');">³¹</span> — Admittedly there is no identification mark on them. But the point [as explained by Rab Judah] is important in regard to the question whether the [lost vessels] should be returned to [a claimant who is] a learned man<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who is not likely to claim goods to which he is not entitled. ');">³²</span> [and who recognises the vessels] by sight:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra 19a. ');">³³</span> If [it is a case where] the eye has sufficiently noted [the lost vessels] he is sure to know them, and we give them back to him. But [in a case] where the eye has not sufficiently noted them he cannot be sure to know them, and we do not give them back to him. For Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel: In the following three matters learned men do conceal the truth: In matters of a tractate,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If he asked whether he is familiar with a certain tractate of the Talmud he will modestly say 'no' — even though in fact he is familiar with it. ');">³⁴</span> bed,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This is explained in various ways. According to Rashi it refers to a question which may be put to a scholar regarding the performance of his conjugal duties, and to which he may decline to give a correct answer because of a sense of delicacy. ');">³⁵</span>

Jastrow